Lenovo 2562

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2562  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime13.4 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 08:42
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2020-$92
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 75.8
43% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 82.7
8-Core 83.8
11% 83.2 Pts
64-Core 83.3
5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 19.8
14% 18.4 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.3
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0303B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 69 39 5 105 9.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
836GB free
Firmware: CC62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 122 147 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 162
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 143
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SHARETRONIC Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
30.7% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 28 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR03E1 K222HQL
Typical 2562 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2562

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback