HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory753.7 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 02:32
Run Duration359 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 5222
CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 53
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
72% 139 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 833
80% 658 Pts
64-Core 854
53% 854 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000
Nvidia(10DE 129E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 45GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
158% Outstanding
Lighting 218
Reflection 211
Parallax 242
178% 224 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 204
Splatting 179
163% 202 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 158%
Great: 173%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT30Q.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2368 2417 2449 2599 1255 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,321
Write 2,442
Mixed 1,450
SusWrite 1,880
403% 1,773 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 73.9
260% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 1107
815% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 295%
Great: 368%
Fantom DRIVES VENOM8 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4494 4535 4473 4512 3878 2398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
529% Outstanding
Read 3,384
Write 4,439
Mixed 2,942
SusWrite 4,048
838% 3,703 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 94.8
326% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,312
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 1,075
788% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 529%
Great: 602%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
831GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2551 2631 2657 2665 2702 2701 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 1,604
Write 1,680
Mixed 1,916
SusWrite 2,651
445% 1,963 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 79.2
278% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1136
DQ Write 902
DQ Mixed 1,091
797% 1,043 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 357%
Great: 500%
Samsung 870 QVO 8TB-$540
25TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1525 1523 1525 1525 1534 1539 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BM2-CTD M386A8K40BM2-CTD Micron 72ASS8G72LZ-2G6B2 Micron 72ASS8G72LZ-2G6B2 M386A8K40BM2-CTD M386A8K40BM2-CTD M386A8K40BM2-CTD M386A8K40BM2-CTD Micron 72ASS8G72LZ-2G6B2 Micron 72ASS8... 383GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 63.4
MC Mixed 42.1
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 6.9
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 VSC9636 VP2768-4k
Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback