Huanan Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 02:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 181
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 717
62% 531 Pts
64-Core 1,479
92% 1,479 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 73%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.6% Above average
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 107
Parallax 73.9
63% 86.1 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 58.9
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 422
Mixed 364
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 28
95% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 335
253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
222GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 97 97 96 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 170
Write 154
Mixed 103
SusWrite 96.7
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 36.6
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 20.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 105%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 39 165 23.8" 1920 1080 ACR0850 KG242Y P
Typical Default string Builds (Compare 949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback