Asrock X570 Creator

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Creator  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 16:38
Run Duration286 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 171
2-Core 325
103% 193 Pts
4-Core 667
8-Core 1,278
116% 973 Pts
64-Core 2,777
172% 2,777 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Asus(1043 8736) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 176
Parallax 178
140% 175 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 161
Splatting 132
130% 163 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LM3T8HCJM-00003 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: GXT3003Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 420 401 432 433 433 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 435
Mixed 339
SusWrite 424
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 43
150% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 202
153% 206 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 462 462 464 463 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 456
Mixed 438
SusWrite 462
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 57.8
190% 64.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 205
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
157GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2087 2234 2216 2094 1932 1621 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,536
Write 2,397
Mixed 1,556
SusWrite 2,030
478% 2,130 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 85.2
293% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,392
DQ Write 1,099
DQ Mixed 1,201
911% 1,230 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 372%
Great: 425%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$160
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,777
Write 3,383
Mixed 3,056
690% 3,072 MB/s
4K Read 79.6
4K Write 193
4K Mixed 112
367% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1193
900% 1,210 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
WDC WD140EDFZ-11A0VA0 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 195 200 208 208 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 221
Write 222
Mixed 137
SusWrite 203
44% 196 MB/s
DQ Read 6.5
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 6.2
5% 7.83 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 10.6
20% 7.85 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 26%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
171GB free
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 445 442 446 443 445 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 403
Mixed 359
SusWrite 442
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 38
133% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 181
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 125%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB
65GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 123 122 121 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 130
Write 127
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 123
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GVK 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 42.6
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 41.4
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 124%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BBF LG ULTRAGEAR+
Typical X570 Creator Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 228%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Creator

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,260
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback