To Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1176 x 664 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200330
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 12:34
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 85.1
2-Core 170
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 561
55% 450 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
417GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1369 446 441 403 412 403 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 875
Write 1,138
Mixed 1,298
SusWrite 579
220% 972 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 49.9
160% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 507
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 433
312% 408 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 138%
Great: 253%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
697GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 121 120 120 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 97.8
Write 53.9
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 121
56% 76.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
369GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 96 96 94 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 95.1
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 95
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback