Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150514
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '23 at 11:34
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	48%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 92 1-Core 79.7 2-Core 140 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 215 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 87.3 47% 69.7 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 68.4 Splatting 48 49% 61.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 480GB SSD 480GB 280 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS2705F SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 259 264 308 294 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 398 Write 349 Mixed 282 SusWrite 223 70% 313 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 6.6 49% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 13.3 60% 135 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 92%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 690GB free Firmware: CC1H SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 103 101 105 104 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 89.8 Write 89.5 Mixed 54.2 SusWrite 102 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 7,002 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 93.3 43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	26	60	24"	1920 1017	DELA07F DELL P2212H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,196x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	506x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	498x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	568x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	482x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	350x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	171x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	151x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	92x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	90x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $492	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16