To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200330
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 09:39
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 674
60% 507 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 39.9
Parallax 37.7
30% 38 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 26.7
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme NE-256 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0620A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 373 703 109 112 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,285
Write 1,107
Mixed 881
SusWrite 312
200% 896 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 30.5
120% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 123%
Great: 195%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
81GB free
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 423 443 448 447 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 367
Write 372
Mixed 348
SusWrite 419
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 27.8
102% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 185
162% 239 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
344GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 128 128 128 130 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 138
Write 134
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 127
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 109%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$80
802GB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 129 130 129 131 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 145
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 128
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 60 60 27" 1280 720 GSM5776 M227WDP
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback