Asrock Z87 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 06:47
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 194
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 308
40% 303 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
Nvidia(10DE 1106) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AAKS-61L9A0 160GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 89 90 90 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 90.2
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 89.6
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-043.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 19" 1280 720 SAM06BA SMB1940
Typical Z87 Pro4 Builds (Compare 427 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Pro4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $423
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback