Asus PRIME H310M-D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-D  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 03:49
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 46%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 361
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.3% Poor
Lighting 36
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 36.6
29% 37.6 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 25.5
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSTC-MMP120-25 120GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 148 78 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 432
Write 371
Mixed 297
SusWrite 124
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 32.4
122% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 197
172% 254 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
WD5000A 500GB
463GB free
Firmware: 03.03B.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 114 116 117 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 114
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Kimtigo-8G-3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 22.9
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 13 60 23.8" 1280 720 SAM100E S24R35x
Typical PRIME H310M-D Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback