User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMUCAI
MotherboardMUCAI H61
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230814
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 19:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 300
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150
Dell(1028 240A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 7.1
7% 8.23 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 7.4
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron MTFDHBA256TCK 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002P1LN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 852 889 874 1000 308 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,056
Write 926
Mixed 892
SusWrite 715
202% 897 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 46
152% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 694
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 546
419% 573 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 159%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 22.7" 1280 720 IVM562E PL2283H
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback