Lenovo 20M6A00800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20M6A00800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20M6A00800
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 13:50
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3965U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 49.1
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 63.8
32% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 106
8-Core 120
15% 113 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 506C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ9LQ256HBJQ-00000 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV72M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 502 626 575 423 207 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 139
Write 603
Mixed 417
SusWrite 480
94% 410 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 21.8
63% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 187
145% 202 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-005.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 9.6
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 25 60 23.8" 1280 720 HWP3320 HP 24es
Typical 20M6A00800 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20M6A00800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback