Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211223
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 11:17
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 63.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 192
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 353
46% 345 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.21031.1005
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14.2
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 21.8
12% 16.7 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 12.5
11% 13 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 416
Write 297
Mixed 102
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 19.4
35% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 70.6
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 160
107% 125 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 78%
V-GEN03SM19EG240GB 240GB
176GB free
Firmware: R1207A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 71 70 67 67 63 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 487
Write 406
Mixed 219
SusWrite 80
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 10.5
72% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.2
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 22.6
51% 102 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 83%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
241GB free
Firmware: ES13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8 8.7 10 11 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 29.2
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 22.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback