Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 04:04
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 319
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 887
90% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 22.9
Parallax 30.2
18% 25 fps
MRender 16.4
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 21.7
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3873 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 112
Parallax 117
97% 116 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 105
Splatting 97.4
94% 117 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 24 54 42 33 50 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 94%
Lexar 512GB SSD 512GB
181GB free
Firmware: 3.7.2.16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2574 2487 2475 2360 2485 1872 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
320% Outstanding
Read 1,606
Write 2566
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 2,375
470% 2,068 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 66.8
237% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 922
DQ Mixed 1,059
741% 921 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 320%
Great: 313%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
539GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 84 85 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 81.4
Write 39.5
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 83.7
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 59%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
632GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 144 183 182 154 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 168
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 170
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99%
Great: 107%
Clikfree Backup Drive 750GB
204GB free, PID 2828
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 33
Write 38.9
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 37.9
46% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
64% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4AU008G-H3200GST 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 35.1
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 31.4
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 218 60 60 26" 1920 1057 AAA0000 HDTV
Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback