Asus X550LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X550LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550LN
Memory1.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 67.1
37% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 124
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Asus(1043 131D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 10.4
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 8.9
Splatting 8.3
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 5.87%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 375
Write 353
Mixed 321
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 34
111% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 309
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 283
213% 285 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 115%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB
84GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 70 75 70 66 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 73.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 47
SusWrite 73.1
49% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 6.5
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 27 60 15.6" 1366 768 LGD03DB
Typical X550LN Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X550LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback