Medion MR Prof. i51000_256/C173

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MR Prof. i51000_256/C173  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 18:12
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 82.8
2-Core 183
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 359
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.8% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 55.7
Parallax 65.3
34% 54.1 fps
MRender 55.8
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 42.3
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 45 41 39 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 442
Write 424
Mixed 178
SusWrite 46.7
60% 273 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 17.8
66% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 139
122% 189 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A1G43DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0509 SAMSUNG
Typical MR Prof. i51000_256/C173 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Medion MR Prof. i51000_256/C173

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback