HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$124
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 308
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX590 GME
Gigabyte(1458 2323) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 63
Parallax 92.5
56% 74.9 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 79
Splatting 47.3
51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$33
279GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 573 362 346 358 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 828
Write 683
Mixed 377
SusWrite 436
130% 581 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 16.6
53% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 122
88% 114 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 216%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
466GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 159 154 167 153 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 172
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 164
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6CJR6N-UH 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 27.3
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 0 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7004 SAMSUNG
Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,244 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback