Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 11:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$199
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 241
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 794
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,032
64% 1,032 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 107
Parallax 121
95% 115 fps
MRender 171
Gravity 109
Splatting 99.8
100% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-C100/480G 480GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 305 218 221 222 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 411
Write 371
Mixed 332
SusWrite 265
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 61.6
4K Mixed 22.8
100% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 34.3
72% 144 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 166 167 168 165 165 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 108
Write 147
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 166
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
194% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.1% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 14.2
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 58.5
68% 58.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 165 0" 1920 1017 IPS0001 IPS001
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-H GAMING - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback