Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 12 '23 at 03:15
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 152
71% 115 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 347
33% 274 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65%
Great: 80%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1391) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.43% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 6.5
4% 6.57 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 9.4
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.43%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1391) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 56.6
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 62.7
46% 63.6 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 62.6
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MA031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 145 145 148 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 418
Write 325
Mixed 341
SusWrite 169
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 27
85% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 261
186% 237 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
113GB free
Firmware: AM0Q6E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 57 59 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 77.8
Write 78
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 58.8
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 04CB DDR4 2666 2OZ 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.2
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 23.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 30 207 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,216 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback