Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 31 '17 at 12:43
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 151 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 471 46% 375 Pts	64-Core 490 30% 490 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 68%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95 9,561 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5154 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1799 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 194 194 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 210 (C2) HDA temperature 75 54 197569347609	55.7% Above average	Read 481 Write 239 Mixed 85.9 58% 268 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 7.46 60% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 68.2 DQ Mixed 35.5 46% 84.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 83%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 44GB free Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 4129229 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 58918361373626 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2632 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 395 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 22 39 1005024903190 (C2) HDA temperature 22 39 1005024903190 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4129229 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4129229 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4129229 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 8589934593 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11859 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10488 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10488 (F2) Unknown 0 0 23647	60.5% Good	Read 500 Write 184 Mixed 259 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 16.4 83% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 34.5 46% 82 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 219GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 173 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 75 68 7744 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5059 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 15347 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5211 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 206 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5241 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 197568954396 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 205 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 15347 (F1) Unknown 92 88 10863969 (F2) Unknown 93 88 9721172 (FE) Unknown 100 100 1	62.7% Good	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 107 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.41 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 119GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 47 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 75 68 7694 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6562 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 17109 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5693 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 130 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 61 167504183322 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 19 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6729	62.4% Good	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 99 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 2.69 4K Mixed 0.63 145% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 75%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 95GB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 145 145 17198088438 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1086 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3105 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1084 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1095 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1095 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 197569413147 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.5% Above average	Read 101 Write 103 Mixed 105 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.16 75% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.4% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 17.4 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 12.8 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 64.1 62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	864x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	209x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	146x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	110x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	62x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	59x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	84x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	45x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $630

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16