Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory52.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 23:21
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 37
2-Core 72.9
40% 59.8 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 292
26% 219 Pts
64-Core 528
33% 528 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 74.7
Reflection 96.5
Parallax 362
61% 178 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 127
Splatting 198
164% 202 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$183
223GB free
Firmware: 1B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 994 990 959 973 977 1041 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,141
Write 1,199
Mixed 1,226
SusWrite 989
257% 1,139 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 26.5
86% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 126
95% 129 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 139%
Great: 592%
Dell PERC H700 500GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 430 474 479 480 325 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 95%
Dell PERC H700 1TB
167GB free
Firmware: 2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 279 333 204 102 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Dell PERC H700 2TB
105GB free
Firmware: 2.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 785 165 164 164 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965745-026.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
65.7% Good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 23.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.9
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 192%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 75 13.3" 1920 1017 UGD1302 Artist13.3pro
Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback