Samsung 930XBE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemSamsung 930XBE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT930XBE-K38W
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210720
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 23:06
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 164
55% 101 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 158
27% 190 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C16B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.2
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD72K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1087 297 297 302 305 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1,752
Write 1,458
Mixed 1,018
SusWrite 432
259% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 54.7
180% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 574
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 418
319% 437 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 172%
Great: 249%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
60.2% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 10.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 28 0 13.3" 1280 720 BOE06E1
Typical 930XBE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 930XBE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback