Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics184% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 22:33
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900X
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 262
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 682
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,758
109% 1,758 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$820
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
184% Outstanding
Lighting 264
Reflection 240
Parallax 276
216% 260 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 225
Splatting 166
182% 232 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 184%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$115
699GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,220
Write 1,086
Mixed 1,067
251% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 74.8
243% 82.5 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 823
625% 847 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
192GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 482
Write 453
Mixed 441
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 56.2
185% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 444
Mixed 442
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 58.2
190% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$169
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 480
Write 449
Mixed 434
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.2
203% 69.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 51.9
MC Mixed 32.5
112% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 9.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 60 27" 1280 720 AUS2723 VG27A
Typical PRIME X299-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 133%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 144%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-DELUXE II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $446
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback