MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C51
Motherboard	MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '23 at 19:02
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A12-8870E R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G 81 User benchmarks, average bench 39% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45.3% Average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 107 47% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 163 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 164 10% 164 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 35.5 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 36.6 29% 36.9 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 26.4 27% 33.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD_2.5"_TLC_512GB_InnovationIT 512GB 468 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 301 143 172 78 71 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.9% Below average	Read 225 Write 199 Mixed 242 SusWrite 170 47% 209 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 8.5 39% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 30.4 51% 98.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 94%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.5% Poor	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.6 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 8.3 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 232 17% 232 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	144	27"	1280 720	AUS2782 VG279

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	537x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	479x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	389x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	313x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	228x
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	224x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	220x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	205x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	103x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x16GBUnknownBench 43%, 3,974 samples	128x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	97x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16