bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP55KG
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 13:14
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 154
65% 107 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 255
35% 260 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K420
Nvidia(10DE 1162) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 4.6 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso SSD 240GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 193 98 167 80 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 234
Write 212
Mixed 215
SusWrite 162
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 0.3
42% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 22.1
DQ Write 76
DQ Mixed 1.5
15% 33.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 93%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
91GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 65 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 81.9
Write 32.1
Mixed 50
SusWrite 65.1
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D58344758334D32413136303043392020 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 15.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback