Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 10:07
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 326
101% 191 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 918
94% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,114
69% 1,114 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 170
Parallax 173
142% 172 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 132
Splatting 115
114% 143 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 102 79 16 90 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 92.1
Write 86.5
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 53
18% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 10.7
46% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 14.4
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 24.5
15% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 26.8
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 49 60 23" 1280 720 ENC2394 EV2316W
Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,925 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback