Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B360N WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200707
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 02:02
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 75.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 236
79% 144 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 544
66% 507 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.2% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 112
Parallax 103
83% 106 fps
MRender 95.5
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 99.9
81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ PETROL 128GB
51GB free
Firmware: 3.14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 144 144 140 126 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 179
Write 150
Mixed 122
SusWrite 138
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 15.6
55% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 57.9
51% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 46%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 53 57 56 58 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 956
Write 561
Mixed 713
SusWrite 122
130% 588 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 44.8
138% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 775
DQ Mixed 342
321% 482 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 114%
Great: 209%
Inateck FE202x Series 512GB
462GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 41 42 43 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 50
Write 37.4
Mixed 36
SusWrite 41.6
54% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 11.4
657% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 162%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 11.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 32" 1280 720 HSI0001 HiTV
Typical GA-B360N WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B360N WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $232
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback