Biostar A58ML

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A58ML  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '17 at 06:08
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 64.8
2-Core 136
51% 87.8 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 208
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB; yeston 1050 ti 4G
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 29.7
Parallax 33.3
31% 33.8 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 36
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AMD Radeon R7 120GB-$67
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.7% Average
Read 191
Write 194
Mixed 142
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 12.3
72% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 13.6
21% 37.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 104%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
19GB free
Firmware: PBBOC60F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 49.3
Write 44.2
Mixed 9.19
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.23
56% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 34%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 18.1
Write 14.5
Mixed 13.4
19% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.51
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 1.1
106% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
1GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 18.8
Mixed 22.5
29% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 1
130% 2.76 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-461.A00LF 99U5403-467.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.1
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A58ML Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58ML

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback