Amazon g5.xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics179% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive5.82% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon g5.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1536 x 844 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 09:17
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7R32
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 61.9
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 148
58% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 232
29% 222 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10G
Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
179% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 239
Parallax 275
218% 260 fps
MRender 231
Gravity 220
Splatting 158
162% 203 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 179%
Great: 193%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 81GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.7 97 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 80
6% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
3% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 22%
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 155 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.2% Outstanding
Read 588
Write 258
Mixed 469
SusWrite 159
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 49.9
165% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 177
140% 199 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 39.8
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 28.2
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 60 29.7" 1536 844 NVD0000 NVIDIA VGX
Typical g5.xlarge Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Amazon g5.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback