Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory16.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 07:40
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 41%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 502
59% 455 Pts
64-Core 551
34% 551 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 511.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 62.1
Reflection 92.4
Parallax 58.3
51% 70.9 fps
MRender 63.3
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 59.5
51% 62.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 52 26 5.8 50 11 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.8% Poor
Read 187
Write 46.4
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 34.5
17% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 6.9
35% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 17.4
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 13
52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
139GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 86 86 87 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 104
Write 94.6
Mixed 62
SusWrite 87
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C16/8G KHX2400C15D4/4G 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.4
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 53 144 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,775 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $523
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback