Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 108% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190214
Uptime	8.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 78.1 1-Core 110 2-Core 219 76% 136 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 810 75% 624 Pts	64-Core 1,167 72% 1,167 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Zotac(19DA 2471) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 545.84 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	132% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 197 Parallax 189 147% 189 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 186 Splatting 134 124% 154 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 808GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 1039 1192 1203 1198 1183 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 1,784 Write 1,681 Mixed 708 SusWrite 1,093 294% 1,316 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 49.7 160% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 736 DQ Write 512 DQ Mixed 633 470% 627 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 302%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 233GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 378 449 454 451 452 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 453 Mixed 434 SusWrite 405 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 46.3 151% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 276 220% 310 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C17 4x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 59.5 MC Mixed 33.3 120% 41.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 10.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	23.5"	1280 720	SAM08E9 S24B240

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	498x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	262x
Core i7-7740XIntel $234Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	150x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	96x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16