MSI MS-14F1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive328% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Prestige 14Evo B13M
MotherboardMSI MS-14F1  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230103
Uptime17.4 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 23:13
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Memory 67
1-Core 187
2-Core 370
106% 208 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 919
96% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 131F) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 29.4
19% 27.6 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 0.2
7% 9.87 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GB
424GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1974 2014 2031 1906 312 251 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
328% Outstanding
Read 2,134
Write 2,214
Mixed 1,686
SusWrite 1,415
419% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 74.2
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 94.2
323% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,485
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,144
885% 1,220 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 328%
Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNCP3MLYR-N6E 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
138% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 57.8
MC Mixed 51.6
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 24.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 138%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0A42
Typical MS-14F1 Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI MS-14F1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback