Lenovo 81SY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 81SY  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 20:17
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 115
52% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 298
31% 247 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3FFB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.30
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.9% Average
Lighting 54.6
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 50.2
44% 55.3 fps
MRender 40.4
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 44.9
37% 45 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS256GD9TNG-L3A0B 256GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80040C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 243 253 267 268 259 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 758
Write 905
Mixed 779
SusWrite 256
152% 675 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 44.2
4K Mixed 31.9
108% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 326
236% 309 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 172%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
226GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 75 72 71 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 97.4
Write 77.4
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 73.3
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.7
169% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 89.8
45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 33% 9 186 20 144 23.8" 1920 1017 MSI9BA4 MSI G2412
Typical 81SY Builds (Compare 2,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81SY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback