Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 11:43
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 294
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,049
97% 813 Pts
64-Core 1,454
90% 1,454 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB421D57
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1167 662 162 161 157 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 2,239
Write 1,208
Mixed 1,234
SusWrite 404
281% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 60.6
202% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 693
DQ Mixed 795
572% 735 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 209%
Great: 273%
Kingston SHFR200480G 480GB
153GB free
Firmware: 000056R8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 176 167 169 178 156 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 475
Write 439
Mixed 367
SusWrite 210
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 38.5
138% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 180
168% 260 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 103%
Hkvsn ESSD-T100/240G 256GB
127GB free
Firmware: 0208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 378 377 365 370 377 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 314
Write 123
Mixed 262
SusWrite 372
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 22.7
79% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 144
118% 167 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
255GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 104 104 104 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 120
Write 41.2
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 102
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB
975GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 103 105 106 109 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 62.1
Write 96
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 106
66% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 66%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 18 19 20 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 95.2
Write 111
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 18.5
86% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 41.3
MC Mixed 28.7
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 28.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 100%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 0" 1280 720
Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $793
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback