Lenovo 83C4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83C4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 10:24
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 58.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 242
74% 139 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 612
61% 496 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B3A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 13.3
10% 13.7 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 12.8
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 755 772 760 906 892 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 937
Write 877
Mixed 745
SusWrite 804
189% 840 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 44.3
140% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 368
273% 369 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 147%
Great: 227%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT40A1G16TB-062E:F 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 13 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1550
Typical 83C4 Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 83C4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback