Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 09:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 102
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 520
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 523
32% 523 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7
Parallax 5.9
4% 6 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 283 172 173 97 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 1,237
Write 828
Mixed 768
SusWrite 209
169% 761 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 45.3
151% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 610
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 259
259% 421 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 131%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
480GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 150 150 157 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 122
Write 172
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 152
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 Kingston 9905700-026.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 27
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 19.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E8
Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback