bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware20,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1536 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 00:06
Run Duration73 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
CPU 0, 6 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 28
2-Core 54.7
30% 45.3 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 345
30% 255 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 97GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,036
Write 1,156
Mixed 1,144
249% 1,112 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 20.1
68% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 206
170% 244 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 2x16GB
2 of 128 slots used
32GB DIMM DRAM clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.3% Above average
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 51 0 0" 1536 937
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback