Lenovo 30G9S1JD00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 30G9S1JD00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1055
Memory52.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 20:42
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon w7-2475X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 70.3
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 179
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 706
63% 530 Pts
64-Core 3,239
200% 3,239 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000
Legend(17AA 14AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.86
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 197
Parallax 191
147% 190 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 137
Splatting 137
124% 154 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 131%
Great: 137%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HDLB-00BLL 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L2QGXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1430 1525 1620 1695 1682 1690 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,415
Write 1,738
Mixed 1,678
SusWrite 1607
416% 1,860 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 64.1
204% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 461
DQ Mixed 508
408% 581 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 286%
Great: 417%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBRA107N 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
213% Outstanding
MC Read 107
MC Write 83.3
MC Mixed 77.6
256% 89.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 18.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 205%
This bench: 213%
Great: 233%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8025 BenQ PD3200U
Typical 30G9S1JD00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO

System: Lenovo 30G9S1JD00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback