Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 months ago, 7 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2125 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 69.1 1-Core 89 2-Core 217 68% 125 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 671 69% 556 Pts	64-Core 677 42% 677 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.13 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.4% Good	Lighting 77.3 Reflection 92 Parallax 82.9 63% 84.1 fps	MRender 87.1 Gravity 82.3 Splatting 95.2 73% 88.2 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 70%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G-1001 512GB 6,098 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10160101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 312 310 306 305 295 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,679 Write 1,676 Mixed 1,423 SusWrite 350 287% 1,282 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 52.3 188% 71.9 MB/s	DQ Read 828 DQ Write 716 DQ Mixed 790 587% 778 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 264%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD Kingston 9965589-068.E00G 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2666, 2666 MHz 16384, 16384 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.7% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 16 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 20.3 SC Mixed 9.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	55	60	27.5"	1280 720	SAM0C4D U28E590

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM