Asrock Z97 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock Z97 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160727
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '23 at 15:24
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	VEN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 206 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 518 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85B1) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.58 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 69 Parallax 63.3 54% 66.4 fps	MRender 66.6 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 63.6 54% 66 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227P SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 253 298 307 308 298 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 488 Write 314 Mixed 271 SusWrite 260 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 91.3 4K Mixed 13.1 92% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 15.3 54% 118 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60 23,997 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 151GB free Firmware: JE3OA60A SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 66 66 67 65 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 57.6 Mixed 38.9 SusWrite 64.9 42% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GB 364 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	59	31	60	18.5"	1280 720	SAM06A3 SME1920N

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z97 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Extreme4 - $129

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	477x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	288x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	157x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	78x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	66x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	55x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	38x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $75Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	36x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	43x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	39x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $777

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16