Lenovo 80V1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80V1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Savras
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 12:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 516
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.8% Very good
Lighting 89.1
Reflection 171
Parallax 94.6
73% 118 fps
MRender 93.7
Gravity 93.2
Splatting 101
79% 96 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV256HDGL-000L2 256GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L0QBXW7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1196 1207 1076 777 393 384 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 1,206
Mixed 749
SusWrite 839
233% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 44.5
150% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 695
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 493
377% 519 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 176%
Great: 233%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
551GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 20.6
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 34.8" 1280 720 ACR095E X34 S
Typical 80V1 Builds (Compare 116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Lenovo 80V1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback