HP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89ED
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 07:53
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 178
58% 107 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 466
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 510
32% 510 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 89ED) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.26.08
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 18.1
4% 10.9 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 15.7
11% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPTUW-128G-1006 128GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20210006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 173 178 173 152 173 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 558
Write 172
Mixed 239
SusWrite 169
62% 284 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 26.8
94% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 180
149% 217 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 35 0 13.2" 1280 720 CMN13BE
Typical Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro x360 435 13.3 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback