Lenovo 80SX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80SX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 03:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Memory 9.87
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 78.9
20% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 83.9
8-Core 119
13% 102 Pts
64-Core 123
8% 123 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 520
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7158
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
3.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 1.6
Parallax 5.2
4% 3.8 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 7.8
3% 2.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.42%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 56 47 47 41 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.2% Poor
Read 102
Write 172
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 49.5
21% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 16.6
48% 16.5 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 123
95% 129 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 471A5244BB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 5.9
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 2.5
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 30 12 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14C3
Typical 80SX Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80SX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback