Asrock B650E PG Riptide WiFi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B650E PG Riptide WiFi  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B650E PG Riptide WiFi
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 22:34
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900-$367
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 78.5
1-Core 208
2-Core 350
113% 212 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,593
142% 1,200 Pts
64-Core 2,604
161% 2,604 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 115%
Great: 119%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dextor 1TB 512GB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1242 1250 1253 551 67 73 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
225% Outstanding
Read 1,983
Write 1,248
Mixed 1,090
SusWrite 740
281% 1,265 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 61.7
222% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 1,006
DQ Mixed 561
472% 664 MB/s
Dextor 2TB 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2211XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 347 343 343 337 346 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.3% Excellent
Read 377
Write 325
Mixed 346
SusWrite 343
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 24.5
120% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 35.4
75% 154 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
153% Outstanding
MC Read 61.3
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 52.6
157% 54.9 GB/s
SC Read 51.4
SC Write 56.6
SC Mixed 50.4
151% 52.8 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 107%
This bench: 153%
Great: 150%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 0" 1366 768
Typical B650E PG Riptide WiFi Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 146%
UFO

System: Asrock B650E PG Riptide WiFi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $945
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback