MSI MS-ACB31

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMICRO-STAR MS-ACB311
MotherboardMSI MS-ACB31  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140324
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 16:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200H
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 80.2
2-Core 144
59% 99.5 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 189
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 ACB3) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 4.7
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.8
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
507GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 381 423 411 462 463 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 458
Mixed 402
SusWrite 423
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 50.5
164% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 310
243% 336 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23
57GB free, PID 558b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 19 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 65.3
Write 22.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 18
38% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
73% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 64%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 66.5
Write 20
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 15.1
34% 31.3 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.2
84% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.3% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 MSI0001 AIO PC
Typical MS-ACB31 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-ACB31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback