Acer Aspire XC-1760

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-1760  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-1760
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$146
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 175
2-Core 309
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 530
8-Core 993
91% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37.2
Reflection 41
Parallax 38.5
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 27
28% 34.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3512B-AA1 512GB
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 547 283 282 295 294 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,091
Write 1,040
Mixed 993
SusWrite 446
200% 893 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 54.9
184% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 588
DQ Mixed 612
487% 686 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 160%
Great: 215%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
237GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 437 436 449 449 446 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 292
Write 396
Mixed 345
SusWrite 437
84% 368 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 24.2
70% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 107
133% 234 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 125%
Asmedia ASM1153E 1TB
772GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 122 123 126 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 84.9
Write 77.7
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 122
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 99%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
343GB free
Firmware: 1306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 76 76 76 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 74.5
Write 38.7
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 75.6
43% 58.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M4FF Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2B1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 30.8
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 8 217 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0D1A S22F350
Typical Aspire XC-1760 Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-1760

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback