Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics66.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 10:18
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 255
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 956
87% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,235
76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.2% Good
Lighting 86.6
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 76.1
71% 83.2 fps
MRender 65.1
Gravity 77.2
Splatting 68.8
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 409 417 416 409 415 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 418
Mixed 388
SusWrite 400
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 29.2
132% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 44.8
99% 200 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 107%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
217GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 173 177 174 175 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 170
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 176
99% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
138% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.D1GS7.B7B0B 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 31.1
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.9
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 30.4
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 87
46% 87 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC155 PHL 243V7
Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback