Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 145% UFO	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 123% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 171 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 601 60% 491 Pts	64-Core 613 38% 613 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 406E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	190% Outstanding	Lighting 274 Reflection 251 Parallax 284 223% 270 fps	MRender 318 Gravity 234 Splatting 172 190% 241 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 190% Great: 202%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2008 2086 2125 1866 1487 1483 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	309% Outstanding	Read 2,439 Write 2177 Mixed 1,774 SusWrite 1,843 462% 2,058 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 67 218% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 872 DQ Write 515 DQ Mixed 773 554% 720 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 309% Great: 435%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TIMETEC-U16G-3600 2x16GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 25 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 34.4 SC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	28.8"	1280 720	GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	115x
Core i5-7400Intel $94Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	68x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	34x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	29x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	11x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	10x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $195

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16