Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 21:12
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 214
75% 134 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 644
62% 512 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.5% Below average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 50.7
Parallax 44.2
42% 48.7 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 42
35% 42.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 378 122 6.4 6.5 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 383
Write 410
Mixed 366
SusWrite 178
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 193
170% 251 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 100%
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
665GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1650 1681 1857 936 442 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,635
Write 1965
Mixed 1,741
SusWrite 1,108
364% 1,612 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 51.1
168% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 595
419% 538 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 208%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5743-031.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 11
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 17 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback