Asus PRIME X299-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics257% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-A II  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 957
86% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,649
102% 1,649 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Gigabyte(1458 40E4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
257% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 398
Parallax 784
256% 499 fps
MRender 543
Gravity 584
Splatting 308
374% 478 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 257%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,944
Write 1,759
Mixed 1,697
401% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 64.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 91.1
287% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 709
DQ Mixed 821
616% 826 MB/s
Poor: 236% Great: 477%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3600C18 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 30.2
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 36.1" 1280 720 ONN0077 onn. TV
Typical PRIME X299-A II Builds (Compare 1,129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 177%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $1,288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback