MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C08
Motherboard	MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211116
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 90.7 1-Core 130 2-Core 218 84% 146 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 807 74% 622 Pts	64-Core 994 62% 994 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% MSI(1462 809E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.1% Below average	Lighting 45.7 Reflection 60 Parallax 71 37% 58.9 fps	MRender 60.4 Gravity 55.2 Splatting 44.1 43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 448 462 467 466 469 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 476 Mixed 408 SusWrite 460 104% 462 MB/s	4K Read 40.5 4K Write 65.6 4K Mixed 43.9 152% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 153 124% 181 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 220GB free Firmware: U21010RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 405 414 414 414 414 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 502 Write 392 Mixed 277 SusWrite 410 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 18.4 105% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 106 89% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 859B CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD2 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22.6 74% 25.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 29.6 SC Mixed 23.6 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1280 720	AUS27C0 ASUS VZ279

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,534x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	509x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	417x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	491x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	396x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	300x

SSD
SSDPEKNW256G8 256GBIntelBench 119%, 1,046 samples	157x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	111x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	86x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	337x
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	211x
CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 12,037 samples	123x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16